Most Popular Designer Handbags
Popular Designer Handbags
Designer handbags are very popular as presents, but if you don’t know much about handbags it can be a bit difficult knowung whch ones to buy.
One question people often ask is which are the most popular designer handbags. There are lots of famous brand names to choose from but some are in fact more popular than others.
It will probably come as no surprise to discover that Louis Vuitton is the designer brand that is most in demand. LV handbags are discussed on the handbag forums far more than any of the other famous brands. Louis Vuitton handbags are also the most frequently seen on the arms of the rich and famous and the most searched for in Google and Yahoo.
The only problem with ouis Vuitton bags are that they are not cheap and also they are so popular they are probably the most copied handbags in the world. It is estimated that 99% of LV goods sold are fakes !
After Louis Vuitton the next most popular designer is Coach, this may come as a bit of a surprise as Coach does not have the cachet of Gucci, Fendi, Balenciaga and Hermes but they do have the great advantage of combining style, quality and affordability. So ig you are looking for a present that will be appreciated but that will not break the bank then Coach will definitely do the job. Of course if you can afford to pay thousands for a handbag rather than hundreds then you might lik,e to consieder some of the alternatives.
After Louis Vuitton and Coach, it is Gucci that comes in third. Very refined and chic and also more expensive than Coach, but Gucci, Fendi, Balenciaga and Hermes are very feminine and may be appreciated more just because they are so expensive.
Two others that you might consider that are probably not as exclusive (expensive) as LV and Gucci are Radley and also Dooney and Bourke. Dooney and Bourke are very popular for people looking for a high quality handbag rather like Coach that is not going to break the bank.
For more information see Dooney and Bourke .
- Uncategorized | Time: 12:17 am (UTC+8) No Comments »
